Guaranteed Creepy: The Ted Bundy Tapes

Earlier this week, I sat down and made the conscious decision to watch Netflix’s Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes. I had been putting it off for a few days but was interested in the series when I saw it featured on Netflix’s homepage. Right after I started the first episode I was hooked and watched the entire series in one night. When it was finally over I was genuinely unsettled and creeped out.
A monochrome photograph of a expressionless man with piercing eyes
Ted Bundy (photo source: wikipedia)

I know the basics about Ted Bundy, especially as a native Utahn, I remember learning about him when I was very young. I’m familiar with the gory details of quite a few serial killers since I have a passion for true crime documentaries and shows but I haven’t been inclined to research out Ted Bundy in detail. This documentary was the first time I learned about the chronology of the murders. A key part of The Ted Bundy Tapes is the eerie recordings of Bundy talking about the murders, closing the distance between viewer and subject, this results in an appropriate response from the audience.

The Ted Bundy Tapes do a good job of summarizing the multiple killings but fails in going into the explicit details. I get the impression that the goal of this documentary series was to tear apart the conversation most people have about Bundy i.e. “but he was so good-looking and smart, he was one of us”. That conversation is related to the creepiest aspects about the Bundy case, people became caught up in his ability to speak articulately and joke around. He was an attractive flirt that could smooth talk people, quickly getting them under his thumb so that he could manipulate them.

I was partially disappointed in The Ted Bundy Tapes because I was expecting a different approach to the subject, such as a detailed history of Bundy’s life, motives, the crime scenes, and the evidence. Instead, it was more like a summary of Bundy’s whereabouts at the time of the crimes, an outline of the killings and emphasis on the overall attitude of the public. The documentary did a good job of discussing the media coverage of the Ted Bundy cases and how towards the end (before he was executed) Bundy became a strange social-cultural icon.

There were parallels that I noticed in the documentary, between Ted Bundy and the Manson murders, specifically the media coverage and the megalomaniac personalities of Bundy and Manson. Both men had a substantial female fandom while in prison, a frequent occurrence for many males serial killers that I will never understand.

The documentary also did a good job at discussing the changing times in America during the late sixties through the seventies, new types of criminals were emerging and there were limited technological resources available to help catch killers. I think these details are important for younger viewers, and I did not realize this until I was done watching the series. I was perplexed when they mentioned the technology available at the time of the murders because I already knew those facts but then it dawned on me that audiences around the age of 14-20 may not know the technological history of the past seventy years.

This was disturbing, the fact that the documentary interviewed people that said that there was no internet at this time or fax machines, that serial killers was an unheard of concept. The documentary was educating its intended audience about the times of Bundy. The details that were emphasized in this documentary suggested that the intended audience is presumed to be very young.

This got me thinking, if I am right about the intended audience based on the goals of the documentary: ‘debunking’ Bundy as a handsome ‘normal’ guy, and the historical details (women’s movement, civil rights, no internet, no fax machines etc) then can I hypothesize that this documentary’s actual goal was re-educating the youngest intended audiences about a new upgraded discussion on ‘Stranger-Danger’?

Not only could this documentary be an upgraded ‘Stranger-Danger’ warning to the youth, but it can also be considered an attempt at de-glorifying a convicted killer. There was an equal amount of emphasis in terms of the fact that Bundy did rape and kill over thirty women. He was a brutal killer that preyed on very specific groups of females, young white usually college-educated women mostly found on campuses.

Even though I consider my ideas about the intended audience and the goal of this documentary to be just speculation, I did like The Ted Bundy Tapes, it was informative and interesting. It was captivating and strange to hear the recordings of Bundy’s voice talking about the murders in the third person, he had to distance himself from the murders in some way.

I would recommend this documentary to anyone that likes true crimes stories or Netflix Original series centered around crime and action.

If you have already watched The Ted Bundy Tapes, I suggest watching Mindhunter, or Criminal Minds.

Alina’s Rating: 3.5 Electric Chairs/ 5 Electric Chairs

Thank you for reading!

You can also find Alina on Patreon or Instagram

Sabrina & Hill House: Perfect for a Spooky Netflix and Chill

Netflix and Halloween mix perfectly this year with two outstanding series that premiered this month, Chilling Adventures of Sabrina and The Haunting of Hill House. What do I love about these two shows? They are deliciously dark and bloody.

Kiernan Shipka in Chilling Adventures of Sabrina (2018)
imdb.com

Sabrina Spellman is teenage girl half-mortal and half-witch that is torn about her upcoming sweet sixteen and dark baptism, an initiation ritual into the Church of Night, a church of satanic witches and warlocks. Sabrina is full of conflict and questions. Conflict because if she signs her name in the Book of the Beast she will be giving up her mortal-side of her life including her best friends and her boyfriend Harvey. Questions because Sabrina does not seem entirely convinced that the Church of Night is good…

Sabrina makes her choice and begins navigating through the dark and light worlds she co-inhabits. Overcoming perilous obstacles and life-threatening adventures she is becoming stronger and more confident in questioning her leaders (predominately male figures) and the Church of Night.

Kiernan Shipka in Chilling Adventures of Sabrina (2018)
imdb.com

What I love about this Sabrina is that she is not easily fooled, she follows her instincts and isn’t afraid to speak up if something is questionable. What makes me curious about the Chilling Adventures of Sabrina is an underlining critique that is woven within each episode right beneath the surface. I think this critique is on patriarchy, regardless if it’s patriarchy at her mortal high school (society) or within the Church of Night (the Dark Lord himself). The portrayal of the Church of Night also has striking similarities to old school LaVey Satanism (a.k.a. Church of Satan) which has always felt to me as an outlandish inversion of Christian religions rooted in a patriarchal structure. But that’s a discussion for another time.

Alina’s Rating: 4 out of 5 Witches

I love this show and highly recommend it to anyone who also loves Salem, The Witch or Penny Dreadful.

imdb .com

The Haunting of Hill House follows the Crain family and their story, past and present, involving the Hill House that they lived in for a short period of time. The Hill House was undoubtedly haunted but each character has their own separate and uniquely terrifying journey coming to that conclusion.

What is refreshing and thrilling about the storyline is that each character is explored and illuminated (each character gets about one whole episode to themselves). In each episode and through the various characters the Hill House begins to appear more evil and deadly. The common theme that keeps the Crain family and Hill House connected is murder which always sparks up an array of scary happenings while ultimately luring the Crain family back home.

imdb.com

What I love about The Haunting of Hill House is the refreshing use of various scare tactics by the ghosts and house itself. Playing in the realms of the psychological and physical the house has a knack for slowly chipping away at the will and the soul. A few key spooks that I love, the Tall Man and Poppy. When you get to know them, you’ll know what I mean.

What could I talk about as far as a critique when it comes to Hill House? I’d probably discuss the various scare-tactics used by the ghosts. Tactics that remind me of THE RING and EVIL DEAD.

Alina’s Rating: 5 out of 5 Ghosts 

I highly recommend this show for its suspense and scare factor. If you like The Haunting of Hill House try Crimson Peak.


 


Liked this post? Try these:

Gertrude Stein’s “Autobiography” of Alice

527495
goodreads.com

I read The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas in only a few weeks. To be honest, I read a few pages and put it down then picked up other books I have been reading and kind of forgot about it. Then I picked it up again a few days later and couldn’t put it down. I got sucked in and read page after page. I think what hooked me was the style, the echo that the writing has (or is supposed to be) of Alice’s speech. This made the content feel as if it was part of a casual discussion with Alice, who ‘remembers’ the tiniest details when it comes to Gertrude.

This book is one of Gertrude Stein’s most popular works even when it was first published in 1933. What I thought was fascinating about this ‘Autobiography’ is that Stein wrote in Alice’s voice from Alice’s perspective entirely on the subject of Gertrude. Stein uses her partner Alice as a literary device to discuss her writing, social life, and their relationship (barely).

I felt that Stein had taken the purpose of ‘autobiography’ to gain perspective on herself but the issue of this is that the perspective she writes from (Alice) is Stein’s own creation. This is evident from the beginning of the autobiography which is vague and contains muddled details about Alice’s life before meeting Stein. Then when she finally comes to Paris and meets Stein, there is more focus and clarity not only in the content and story-telling but in the writing.

The only other work by Stein I’ve read is Tender Buttons which is a million miles from the ‘autobiography’ in terms of content and style. I have conflicting feelings when it comes to both books but I think what I need to do is read more of her work. As for Alice, I am fascinated by her and feel like Stein’s ‘autobiography’ of her fails to really give the audience the true Alice. I plan on reading Alice’s real autobiography soon to get a real perspective on Stein’s.

After finishing the ‘autobiography’ I was unsettled, honestly disturbed. To me, Stein uses Alice as a mask and magnifying glass on herself which makes it seem like she doesn’t really care about Alice but only cares about the attention she gets.

What disturbs me specifically, the three pages that make up the first chapter “Before I came to Paris” which is Alice’s life before Stein, and the repetition in the first half of the book that talks about Alice sitting and talking with “other wives of geniuses”. This naturally assumes that Alice is also the wife of a genius, and because she is being used as literary-cover (mask) by Stein, Stein is really saying she is a genius. I’d rather have her come out and say it plainly than go about doing it this way.

Overall, I love the style and writing itself. It’s the content and intent of Stein that perplex me. I want to read Alice’s real words and might pick up some of their letters to each other and compare her writing to Stein’s “Alice’s” voice. I think this work is an interesting experiment in style but I question the real motives behind its creation but of course, there is the death of the author, does Stein’s intent even matter?

Alina’s Rating: 4 Picasso’s out of 5 Picasso’s

 

 

Going Old School with Jack White: Review of Boarding House Reach Show in SLC UTAH

Jack White performing in Salt Lake City 2018 Photo: David James SwansonEarlier this year I set an alarm for the exact hour tickets for Jack White’s 2018 tour would go on sale. I remember waking up to my alarm heart pumping buying my tickets. I spent the next few months looking at the tickets I had printed out and pinned up above my calendar, August seemed so far away then but suddenly it was here. Last night, finally, I went and saw Jack White at Saltair in Salt Lake City, Utah.

By the time I got to Saltair with my boyfriend, Tyler Childers was finishing up. We were in line to get in about to experience something we never have before. What was different about this concert experience was YONDR. This was a “NO-PHONE” show. While in line we were given small green pouches to put our phones in. They had a security retail clasp that sealed the pouch and could only be opened with certain magnetic disks.

Yondr system.jpg
Yondr pouch from www.overyondr.com/howitworks/

Security was pretty thorough and everyone in line was searched. Yondr employees were everywhere and we had to go through about two layers of them before even entering Saltair. The first layer handed out the pouches and helped guests put their phones in them. The second layer past security checked every pouch to make sure it was closed. You keep the pouch on you which is a little awkward since it really sticks out of a back pocket.

As a “No-Phone” show, there were no photos or recordings allowed and you could only get your phone out of the pouch in specific areas. It was a little strange to see everyone phone-less walking around and talking. A little bizarre but at the same time, it was refreshing. I had to communicate with my boyfriend a place to meet just in case we got separated but overall I thought it was really cool to have a couple hours phone-less. My boyfriend, on the other hand, thought it was ridiculous and impractical. Both of our experiences with this phone-free show were different but I think important in understanding both sides of this kind of event. I think no access to phones during a concert is cool and definitely “old school”, devices make the experience different today and we are constantly distracted, not fully paying attention and devoting our time to “here and now”. While on the other hand our phones are so incorporated into our daily lives that without access to them could handicap us.

Around 9 p.m. stage lights blacked out and the crowd roared. Jack White came on and everyone was bathed in blue and white lights. His band all dressed in black were vibrant and professional, banging their heads together as Jack White moved across the stage singing and playing guitar exuding his unique magnetism. Alternating between drums and guitar for a few songs Jack White was energetic and connected with the audience the entire time.

Jack White performing in Salt Lake City 2018 Photo: David James Swanson

I noticed that without the distraction of phones, there were no tiny screens blocking my view of the stage just bobbing heads. The audience’s response and interaction with White was fast paced and instantaneous. In the end, just when everyone thought it was over and White exited the stage, singing began to grow into a loud chorus from the audience in front to the very back, clapping and singing the popular “Seven Nation Army”. The crowd kept up the singing for a couple minutes before bursting into a roar as White came back on stage with his band, the drums began to pound and the crowd erupted as White played “Seven Nation Army” and then a few more songs.

Jack White performing in Salt Lake City 2018 Photo: David James Swanson

Overall, I have to say I had a great time and not having access to my phone really gave me a different (arguably better) experience at this concert than other ones I’ve attended in the past. Jack White was electric, he lit up the stage and his band matched him perfectly in skill and energy. The words that keep popping up in my mind about this performance are “magnetic and professional”. I could tell just from watching the show, these were professional musicians, these are artists that take their work seriously and have a deep devotion for the music and the audience, an attitude, and approach that I have rarely if ever seen before.

Alina’s Rating: 5/5

More Jack White Stuff

Jack White’s Spotify Playlist: Boarding House Reach Tour Set Lists

“Corporation” https://jackwhiteiii.com/news/

Review: “E.E. Cummings: A Selection of Poems”

27246261
goodreads.com

I recently finished reading this book of poems, a selection of poems by E.E. Cummings, this collection featured fantastic poems that display Cummings love for the written word, skills in typography and his particular use of punctuation and enjambment.

Originally published in 1923 this selection contains poems that might be considered risky even in the ’20’s about sex and sexual urges. There are also poems that display Cummings ongoing “un-doing” of words, punctuation and the typographical form of a poem on the page. A consistent pattern that I noticed towards the end of this collection is his use of “un”.

In the poem, “pity the busy monster, manunkind” (pg.125), “un” is used to undo and possibly invert not only the meaning of words such as ‘mankind’, ‘wish’, and ‘self’ but to put these words and their meanings on their head (or in on themselves). Cummings weaves in words such as “disease”, “electrons”, “hypermagical”, and “ultraomnipotence”, his puts some words together while emulating (I think) a sing-song voice that reminds me of advertisements for cure-alls.

The poem, I think, talks about the ‘silliness’ of mankind and death which is always present. I wonder if this poem is specifically about death as an unavoidable reality regardless of how far mankind has “progressed” or if it is making fun of people that believe in the progress of mankind to overcome death? Is the “hypermagical ultraomnipotence” a reference to god? I am not sure.

I would love to read some criticism of this poem and others published around the same time to help me better understand where Cummings is going with his poetry. I honestly felt that although Cummings was tearing poetry apart, in terms of form and style and creating something all his own, his poems operate on the same mastery levels like the greatest poets who lived hundreds of years before Cummings time.

Cummings poems may look like simplistic easy-reads but there is really so much more packed into them than meets the eye. I love reading E.E. Cummings and have a couple other books of his poems that I love just as much as this one and highly recommend to readers,

“Etcetera: The Unpublished Poems” by E.E. Cummings

17370

“No Thanks” by E.E. Cummings

294354

photo sources: goodreads.com

A plus note about “E.E. Cummings: A Selection of Poems” is the introduction by Horace Gregory which adds some flavor and plenty of words from Cummings himself on his poetry and poetry in general. This introduction really adds to the experience of reading this book of poetry in its entirety. My edition is a 1965 reprint edition and can be found on Amazon.

Alina’s Rating: 5/5